<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paul McMorrow - Snappy Title TK TK &#187; Wired</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/tag/wired/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:09:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wired Slags Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2009/01/24/wired-slags-patrick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2009/01/24/wired-slags-patrick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deval Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/?p=1015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[February&#8217;s Wired sizes up the challenges facing Barack Obama as he tries to bring the massive federal bureaucracy online. (Trouble with links, purchasing and licensing? They had no idea.) The magazine also spotlights a pol who just might presage the &#8230; <a href="http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2009/01/24/wired-slags-patrick/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>February&#8217;s <em><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/issue/17-02">Wired</a></em> sizes up the <a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/magazine/17-02/ff_obama?currentPage=all">challenges</a> facing Barack Obama as he tries to bring the massive federal bureaucracy online. (Trouble with links, purchasing and licensing? They had <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/21/AR2009012104249.html">no idea</a>.)</p>
<p>The magazine also spotlights a pol who just might presage the failure of Obama&#8217;s wired White House. It&#8217;s our own governor, Deval Patrick.</p>
<p>What the magazine saw in Patrick certainly isn&#8217;t the type of prime-time press any halfway ambitious pol wants.<span id="more-1015"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><em>In a precursor to My.BarackObama.com, the Patrick campaign placed the state&#8217;s voter list on its Web site, allowing its supporters to download phone numbers and call neighbors. &#8220;We believed in people&#8217;s ability to organize themselves and get involved,&#8221; says Charles SteelFisher, who ran the campaign&#8217;s Web operation. </em></p>
<p><em> After the election, the governor&#8217;s team launched DevalPatrick.com to keep supporters engaged. On a MyIssue page, registered commenters could propose, comment on, and vote for legislative ideas.  But the administration was immediately blasted when a database feature designed to verify Massachusetts residency was alleged (incorrectly) to reveal unlisted phone numbers. The privacy flap lured a collection of trolls and conspiracy theorists to the site, crowding out earnest discussion on gambling bills and income taxes with 9/11 chatter and religious debates. Critics, meanwhile, said that Patrick&#8217;s efforts were less about engaging the public than about running a permanent online campaign. </em></p>
<p><em>Eventually Patrick&#8217;s Web site recovered, developing a more sophisticated way of moderating comments and creating forums around the governor&#8217;s plans to reduce property taxes and add public kindergarten programs. The site also allowed people to create grassroots communities to work on issues they cared about. Still, the public isn&#8217;t exactly burning up the site: The leading vote-getter, a bill to promote fathers&#8217; custody rights in divorce cases, had just 1,100 tallies as of mid-December. Offshore wind power, meanwhile, was losing, 16 votes to 15.</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2009/01/24/wired-slags-patrick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Journalism Sausage-Making!</title>
		<link>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2008/09/08/super-journalism-sausage-making/</link>
		<comments>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2008/09/08/super-journalism-sausage-making/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/?p=430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wired the magazine is putting together a profile of Charlie Kaufman. And as the thing comes together, Wired the internet monster is liveblogging the whole editorial process &#8211; pitches, interviews, edits, unanswered emails, the drama and monotony and frustration of &#8230; <a href="http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2008/09/08/super-journalism-sausage-making/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/"><em>Wired</em></a> the magazine is putting together a profile of Charlie Kaufman. And as the thing comes together, Wired the <a href="http://blog.wired.com/">internet monster</a> is <a href="http://blog.wired.com/storyboard/">liveblogging</a> the whole editorial process &#8211; pitches, interviews, edits, unanswered emails, the drama and monotony and frustration of the editorial process, from start to finish.</p>
<p>The story-within-a-story-about-a-story meme seems perfect for Kaufman &#8211; a point that is argued in this editorial pitch meeting, which was filmed and promptly posted to <a href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>. How meta can/will this thing get? We shall soon find out.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_kXk33bo3OU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_kXk33bo3OU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.paulmcmorrow.com/2008/09/08/super-journalism-sausage-making/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
